Career pathing software answers one of three completely different questions, depending on which vendor you are talking to. Does it tell an employee what the next level requires? Does it match them to an internal opening? Or does it recommend a course? Those are three products, and shortlisting across them is why this category so often ends in a tool nobody uses.
Twelve tools below, grouped by what they actually sell, with every price read on the vendor's own site in September 2026. Two of the twelve publish a figure a mid-sized company can act on.
{{banner-2="/banner-page"}}
Three different products called career pathing
Get this wrong and nothing else matters, so it is worth being precise.
- A career framework tool answers "what does the next level look like and what do I need to demonstrate". You author tracks, levels, competency matrices and promotion criteria. Progression, Lattice Grow, Deel Engage, TalentGuard, Leapsome.
- An internal talent marketplace answers "what open role, project or mentor should this person move to next". It matches people to opportunities using a skills graph. Gloat, Fuel50, Eightfold, Workday, Cornerstone, 365Talents.
- A learning platform answers "what course should they take". Juno Journey, and Cornerstone's core product.
Only the first requires you to have decided your levels. Only the second requires a large enough pool of internal openings to be worth matching against — and that is a size argument disguised as a feature, which explains why every marketplace vendor on this list sells to enterprises. A 150-person company does not have enough internal vacancies for a matching engine to find anything.
Buying Gloat to get a competency matrix is a category error. So is buying an LMS because your managers cannot explain what a promotion requires.
Career framework tools
The group most companies under 500 people actually need, and the only group with any published pricing.
Progression
The purest career-framework tool here — it does nothing else. Build, share and maintain frameworks, with 300+ library templates and skills, an AI build assistant, unlimited teams, users, skills, pathways and salary bands, plus change history and public frameworks. Its own positioning is unusually honest about scale: typically used by individual teams as well as whole organizations, and "perfectly set up for technical teams and companies — for example start-ups and tech consultancies".
- Pricing — not published; Platform and Grow tiers are both "Talk to Us". There is a free tier, and a seat is defined as any logged-in user including admins.
- Speed — states a single team can roll out "in days or even hours", which is the fastest claim in the category by a wide margin.
- Best for — companies that want a framework live this month rather than a platform project.
- Worth knowing — its sister site publishes a free directory of 159 real career ladders from companies including Circle CI, Intercom, Medium and Amazon. That is a genuinely useful starting point whether or not you buy anything.
Lattice Grow
Career tracks built from Lattice-built templates, competency matrices that make role expectations and skill progression explicit, and individual development plans with AI-suggested growth areas. No talent marketplace, no courses — it is framework and development planning only, which is a virtue if that is the gap.
- Pricing — the only fully published price card in this category. Grow is a $4 per seat per month add-on; Foundations is $13. Billed annually, USD only. Minimum annual agreement $4,000, which binds below roughly 26 seats and is irrelevant at 200.
- Best for — companies that want the framework wired into review cycles rather than standing alone.
- Watch out for — the pricing page does not say whether Grow can be bought without a base plan. Ask before you budget $4.
Deel Engage
Formerly Zavvy. Carries a career framework builder, path templates, a competency library and development plans, with structured career tracks and expectations defined by level and role. Competency models are AI-generated from a prompt, which removes the blank-page problem.
- Pricing — not published anywhere. Deel publishes prices for its hiring and employment products and no figure for Engage.
- Best for — companies already on Deel.
- Watch out for — the branding is mid-transition. Its pricing page opens "Zavvy is now Deel Engage!" while its homepage still presents standalone Zavvy. Confirm what you are actually signing for.
TalentGuard
Framework-first with a governance emphasis — explicit skills-based routes between roles, a career lattice showing vertical, lateral and diagonal paths, readiness scoring against target roles, and audit trails with timestamps. Its own positioning is "built for organizations where talent decisions carry real risk".
- Pricing — no pricing page exists. The only published commercial offer is a 90-day pilot scoped to 25 to 50 roles.
- Best for — regulated employers who need promotion and succession decisions to be defensible with evidence trails.
- Watch out for — it requires a governed skills ontology, which TalentGuard supplies and your experts then have to review and approve. That is real internal work.
Leapsome
Competency frameworks are included with every plan: define company-wide or team-specific skills, visualize each skill by level so people understand expectations, and show pathways to the next level of seniority. A separate Learning module covers the course side.
- Pricing — its pricing page displays a figure that contradicts its own FAQ, so no rate is quoted here. What is published cleanly: no setup fee, a one-year minimum contract term, 14-day free trial with no card, implementation of one to four weeks, and a stated $6,000 annual threshold for customer-success services.
- Best for — companies that want frameworks, reviews and learning from one vendor.
- Watch out for — get the per-seat rate in writing. The published number does not reconcile with the published threshold.
{{banner-1="/banner-page"}}
Internal talent marketplaces, and why they are all enterprise
Strong products, none of them realistically buyable below about a thousand people. The evidence is on their own sites.
- 365Talents — states it outright: "large and enterprise organizations, typically 1,000 employees and above". Prices in units of 1,000 users per year, offers 3-to-5-year commitments, and quotes 6 to 12 weeks of onboarding. Modules split the framework layer from the marketplace layer, so name the module you mean.
- Gloat — the archetype. Matches employees to internal openings, projects and mentorships off a knowledge graph. Its proof point is the largest single-day marketplace deployment, 300,000 employees inside 24 hours. No pricing page exists.
- Fuel50 — sells the framework layer (Skills Architecture, Skills Ontology) and the marketplace layer (Gigs, Mobility, Succession) as separate plans. Pricing is by employee count and modules, with cost per employee falling as you add people — which tells you where the sweet spot is.
- Eightfold — matches people to jobs, projects, gigs and mentors, with agentic career coaching, inferring skills from work signals rather than asking you to author a taxonomy. "Fortune 500 companies already decide with Eightfold." No pricing page.
- Workday — Career Hub for career pathing suggestions, Talent Marketplace for internal opportunities, Skills Cloud underneath. Sold as modules of Workday HCM, so in practice only available if you already run Workday.
- Cornerstone — Talent Marketplace and Skill Passport sit on top of what is fundamentally a learning platform with a content business attached. Quote-only. Its product index does list a small and midsized business solution, which is the one crack in the enterprise wall, but no price or seat band backs it.
The useful takeaway is not that these are bad. It is that a matching engine needs inventory. If you post six internal roles a year, you do not have a marketplace problem.
Learning platforms sold as career pathing
- Juno Journey — an LMS and LXP with personal development plans attached to learning content, AI course generation, and live plus e-learning delivery. $5 per seat per month for Juno Growth, with add-ons at $3 each. Note the team-size slider starts at 200 people, so that figure is priced at 200 seats and up.
- Skills Base — included to draw a boundary, because it gets recommended here constantly. It is a skills matrix and assessment tool: skills inventory, gap analysis, competency mapping. Career pathing appears as one top-tier feature called internal career mobility insights, which is reporting rather than framework authoring. Free forever up to 25 users and 250 skills, then $2.25 per person per month, or $4 for SSO and competency analysis.
A naming trap worth avoiding: skills-base.com is the HR skills vendor. skillsbase.io is an unrelated company doing telecoms computer vision.
Two vendors to strike off your list
- PathSavvy — both its homepage and pricing page now serve a redirect to a GoDaddy domain-for-sale page. There is no product site left.
- Sora — its domain redirects to adp.com. Whatever happened, there is nothing Sora-branded to evaluate, and it was an HR workflow-automation tool rather than a career pathing product in any case.
What career pathing software costs
Published figures only, for a 200-person company. The list is short for a reason.
- Skills Base — $2.25 per person per month is $5,400 a year; $4 is $9,600. Free to 25 users. The only genuinely self-serve purchase in the category.
- Lattice Foundations plus Grow — $17 per seat per month, roughly $40,800 a year, billed annually, $4,000 minimum.
- Juno Journey — $5 per seat per month at 200 seats, so about $12,000 a year, plus $3 per add-on.
- Progression — free tier available; paid tiers not published.
Gloat, Fuel50, 365Talents, Eightfold, Cornerstone, Workday, TalentGuard and Deel Engage publish nothing. Nine of the twelve vendors here have no published price at all, and two route a pricing URL to an error page or a parked domain.
Do you need software yet?
Probably not, if you have not written the framework. This is the part vendors will not tell you and their own sites quietly confirm.
The content of a career framework is free. Progression's sister site publishes 159 real career ladders from named companies. Leapsome gives away a competency framework template as a Google Sheet, with instructions to copy it — and then says, in the same breath, that "a competency framework sitting in a Google Doc doesn't change much. The value emerges when frameworks are embedded in how you hire, review, promote, and develop people."
That is the honest sequencing, from a vendor. Write the framework in a spreadsheet using published templates, because that part costs nothing. Buy software when you need it to drive promotion and review cycles rather than to invent the content. The failure mode is buying a platform to do your thinking, then discovering you still have to decide what a senior engineer is.
If you are at that stage, job leveling covers building the level structure, and skill will matrix is a lighter tool for deciding who needs what.
How to choose
- Decide which of the three products you are buying. Framework, marketplace, or courses. Write it down before the first demo.
- Count your internal openings per year. Under a couple of dozen, skip the marketplace category entirely.
- Ask whether the framework layer and the marketplace layer are the same SKU. At Fuel50 and 365Talents they are explicitly not, so "we use Fuel50" tells you nothing until the module is named.
- Ask whether you must adopt their skills ontology. Gloat, Fuel50, Eightfold, Workday and TalentGuard all require one. Progression, Lattice, Leapsome and Deel Engage let you author your own. That decision shapes years of maintenance.
- Get the contract term early. 365Talents offers 3-to-5-year commitments. Leapsome's minimum is one year. The difference matters more than the monthly rate.
- Check it connects to reviews. A career framework that does not feed promotion decisions is a wiki page. Performance management systems covers that side.
Where Effy AI fits
Effy AI covers the framework layer, not the marketplace. It has no internal opportunity matching and no course library, and the vendors above do those jobs properly.
What it does: career frameworks with tracks, levels and competency matrices, promotion signals and growth opportunities defined per level, personal development plans and performance improvement plans. The framework sits in the same system that runs reviews, which is the specific thing Leapsome's own guidance says makes a framework worth having — the expectations and the assessment against them are not in two different places.
Pricing is $3 a seat per month for annual 360 reviews, $6 for multiple cycles, and $2 a seat for goals and OKRs, free up to 5 users.
Related: employee development platform covers the learning and development-planning tools, individual development plan examples has plans to copy, leadership development plan covers the manager track, and skill gap analysis covers finding the holes before you build paths over them.
The short version
Three products share this name. Career framework tools tell people what the next level requires. Talent marketplaces match people to internal openings and need enough openings to be worth it, which is why all six are enterprise. Learning platforms recommend courses.
Two vendors publish a price you can act on: Skills Base at $2.25 to $4 a head, and Lattice at $13 plus $4 with a $4,000 annual minimum. Juno Journey publishes $5 a seat but starts at 200 seats. Nine of twelve publish nothing, and PathSavvy and Sora no longer exist as products.
Write the framework first, from a free published template. Buy software to run it, not to invent it.
